I work in Medical Equipment Quality Systems and have identified the need to review the timeliness of training. Some of our QMS procedures have deadlines of 60 or 90 days after the release date, but decisions about these deadlines do not appear to be consistent or relative to risk. What good resources can I use to justify the need to adjust these deadlines? The relevant documents are published and updated for users, but training is not required for 90 days, which in my opinion is too long. Share your opinion.
2 years, 9 months ago
0
kassadi
- I agree with you. Training for 90 days is not a beneficial thing.
2 years, 9 months ago
0
drascons
- You should analyze the training first. If you can exclude unnecessary info from it, it'd be good.
2 years, 9 months ago
0
thomasparson
- Your field seems to be very interesting. I personally worked as a senior advisor in a private hospital and know how important is to have good medical equipment. But sometimes employees don't know how to work with it and that leads to bad situations. Of course, 90 days are too much for training, but I would keep it somewhere in the middle of 50-60 days However, you can read this article at https://www.docsie.io/blog/training_manual_template/ that has some information about training templates you may need. But again, training for 60 days is the best choice, imho.
2 years, 9 months ago
Want to add a comment? Join the makexyz community.