Ideas Of Andrew Carnegie And Samuel Gompers
It is hard to overrate the popularity and fame of both leaders, Andrew Carnegie and Samuel Gompers. Even though they both lived at the end of the 1880s, their ideas seem to be immortal. People were, are, and will be always interested in the labor market, economy, and work organization as any society lives in a material world: people have to produce some useful, goods to exchange them for money as this is a universal charge.
To begin with Carnegie’s and Gompers’ views of work, both of them were industrialists but Carnegie can be described as a sharply tuned leader as his attitude to the work was literally disassembled into quotes. Andrew was this legendary entrepreneur who claimed that the one and only properly a worker should fight is through his work. It is important to mention Carnegie not only provided theories but also acted, for instance, exactly he was that who set a 6-hour-long working day and a 6-day working week. To summarize work was the higher value for this leader and money as a result of the work itself did not play a big role. As for Gompers’ attitude to work, his theory was to provide an 8-hour-long working day with a 5-day working week. The Industrial Workers of the World. In comparison with Andrew, he was not only an entrepreneur and industrialist, but he had enough power to push the US government as a politician and to practice his own offered laws to the parliament. Not in a year, but one should mention Gompers’ ideas found its followers and an 8-hour-long working day was applied to practice.
As for the labor market, Carnegie claimed a worker has to get enough money to have a comfy life (healthy and quality food, a well-equipped place to rest) but the excess amount of money was not a dire necessity. The leader claimed labor is the one and only value workers have to appreciate, sometimes even family did not play a big role. Gompers’ ideas were different as he was sure workers do not need only material values, but they tend to appreciate any social get-togethers. He appreciated his workers’ labor and claimed any worker should get decent pay for his work. He did not mention his ideas about an excess amount of money and stood quite loyal to it.
Attention must be paid to the last issue where Carnegie’s and Gompers’ ideas overlap — the economy. Both of these men were born in the middle of the 1880s, an industrial era. That is the main reason why both Andrew and Samuel have pretty much the same ideas about the economy: they both supported ideas that work and labor that lead to a stable economy are the main values in the world, they always encouraged entrepreneurs and small businesses as they were businessmen themselves and they did not appreciate the outcome the labor, but the labor and work themselves which always result in stable and developed economy.
As for me, I found Samuel Gompers’ ideas more persuasive. It is better for a human being to have a working week with two days off as a person has to recovery to start a new working week fully rested. In addition, I support Samuel’s ideas about labor, work, and the outcome it: everyone should do their best to aim to be a professional, but even though the results of labor are important for society and money are important for workers themselves, these are not the main values in the working process. Teamwork, mutual support, and communication with management and leaders are not the last issues where attention must be paid and maybe that is the reason the industrial era blossomed in the USA in the early 1900s when people became more involved in business as a science, as a well-organized system, as a system with developed and strict business processes.
The model of the mechanism formed on the basis of the general economic situation, the system of labor market values in the own works of the expert of the Institute of Economics Jason Taylor and the author-scientist https://qualityessay.com/
To begin with Carnegie’s and Gompers’ views of work, both of them were industrialists but Carnegie can be described as a sharply tuned leader as his attitude to the work was literally disassembled into quotes. Andrew was this legendary entrepreneur who claimed that the one and only properly a worker should fight is through his work. It is important to mention Carnegie not only provided theories but also acted, for instance, exactly he was that who set a 6-hour-long working day and a 6-day working week. To summarize work was the higher value for this leader and money as a result of the work itself did not play a big role. As for Gompers’ attitude to work, his theory was to provide an 8-hour-long working day with a 5-day working week. The Industrial Workers of the World. In comparison with Andrew, he was not only an entrepreneur and industrialist, but he had enough power to push the US government as a politician and to practice his own offered laws to the parliament. Not in a year, but one should mention Gompers’ ideas found its followers and an 8-hour-long working day was applied to practice.
As for the labor market, Carnegie claimed a worker has to get enough money to have a comfy life (healthy and quality food, a well-equipped place to rest) but the excess amount of money was not a dire necessity. The leader claimed labor is the one and only value workers have to appreciate, sometimes even family did not play a big role. Gompers’ ideas were different as he was sure workers do not need only material values, but they tend to appreciate any social get-togethers. He appreciated his workers’ labor and claimed any worker should get decent pay for his work. He did not mention his ideas about an excess amount of money and stood quite loyal to it.
Attention must be paid to the last issue where Carnegie’s and Gompers’ ideas overlap — the economy. Both of these men were born in the middle of the 1880s, an industrial era. That is the main reason why both Andrew and Samuel have pretty much the same ideas about the economy: they both supported ideas that work and labor that lead to a stable economy are the main values in the world, they always encouraged entrepreneurs and small businesses as they were businessmen themselves and they did not appreciate the outcome the labor, but the labor and work themselves which always result in stable and developed economy.
As for me, I found Samuel Gompers’ ideas more persuasive. It is better for a human being to have a working week with two days off as a person has to recovery to start a new working week fully rested. In addition, I support Samuel’s ideas about labor, work, and the outcome it: everyone should do their best to aim to be a professional, but even though the results of labor are important for society and money are important for workers themselves, these are not the main values in the working process. Teamwork, mutual support, and communication with management and leaders are not the last issues where attention must be paid and maybe that is the reason the industrial era blossomed in the USA in the early 1900s when people became more involved in business as a science, as a well-organized system, as a system with developed and strict business processes.
The model of the mechanism formed on the basis of the general economic situation, the system of labor market values in the own works of the expert of the Institute of Economics Jason Taylor and the author-scientist https://qualityessay.com/
